Good Vibrations Shoes Inc (GVSI)

[Major Profits]

Well, I think this article has more to do with GVSI and GS then many of yours.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkg49n/were-robbing-fcking-idiots-twitter-influencers-bragged-and-laughed-while-pumping-and-dumping-stocks-sec-says

Like what does this post have to do with GVSI?

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174097239

KMA S/L

But then again, maybe the article would have made more sense to you if I had posted it in reply to this post of yours (what does this have to do with GVSI?):

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173940940

Be aware..."The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Office of Investor Education and Advocacy (“OIEA”) is issuing this Investor Alert to warn investors about fraudsters who may attempt to manipulate share prices by using social media to spread false or misleading information about stocks."

"One way fraudsters may exploit social media is to engage in a market manipulation, such as spreading false and misleading information about a company to affect the stock’s share price. Wrongdoers may perpetuate stock rumors on social media, as well as on online bulletin boards and in Internet chat rooms.The false or misleading rumors may be positive or negative."

"Investors who learn of investing opportunities from social media should always be on the lookout for fraud...... "
https://www.sec.gov/oiea/investor-alerts-bulletins/ia-rumors

Or maybe I should have posted the article in response to this post of yours (what does it have to do with GVSI? Isn't it, for the most part, just your opinion, mainly, about your opinions of pumpers and bashers?)

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174054710

Hey, maybe the SEC was only going after "excited shareholders"?

Anyhow, of particular interest to me was this:

The case could potentially answer one of the most defining legal questions of our time: whether writing “not financial advice.. don’t buy/sell off my tweets EVER” in your Twitter bio can protect you from being found guilty of conspiracy to commit securities fraud. According to the SEC, it can’t.

Hmmm, I wonder if the same might apply to the profiles on MBs such as this one? And then I thought of this post from elsewhere (and not in reply to you):

Guess what dumbass... the SEC destroyed all your moronic sig disclaimers early this year when they made it official that nothing you post at the bottom of a chat board protects you from fraud litigation. Got that deernuts? Nothing you type one finger at a time nonsense on a chat board protects you from your pumping bullshit at all.
Guess you missed the memo. Might want to subscribe to SEC news alerts.[January 19, 2024]

GL

P.S. How about, in the future, replying directly to posts you are talking about? Or is it that you think by doing so the original poster will make money by replying directly to it? Let me know. lmfao